← Back to projects

Multi-Functional Pet Cleaning Tool Design

PetEase
& Dooti.

Less friction.
More room for care.

From the everyday work of animal carers to a modular cleaning concept and a working bag-making prototype.

My individual concept PetEaseSelected team project Dooti
Follow the design journey
ContextDesign engineering / Team 14
My roleIndividual designer + team CIO
MethodsResearch · CAD · Electronics · Prototyping

01 / Shared research

Care is personal.
The work is repetitive.

Our team investigated cleaning, waste handling and grooming across shelters, foster homes and pet-owning households. Repeated setup, awkward cleanup and tool switching turned small tasks into a substantial daily workload.

8Interviews across 4 countries
3 / 2 / 3Shelters / Fosterers / Pet owners
30+Survey participants
Observation 01

Too many transitions.

Changing tools, finding attachments and cleaning up between tasks interrupts the care routine.

Observation 02

Hygiene needs an easy reset.

Collected fur and dirty contact surfaces make maintenance part of the product experience.

Observation 03

Waste care extends beyond pickup.

Containment, carrying and disposal create a wider system to design around.

Shared research and synthesis / Phase 1, pp. 2–10. These insights informed four individual concept directions.

02 / My individual concept

PetEase.

Designed by Yuxuan Zhou

One handle.
A more continuous routine.

I focused on the friction of switching between tools. PetEase combines interchangeable upper heads, loose-fur collection and a passive lower filter in a dual-ended handheld concept.

Original PetEase concept exploration sheet with hand sketches comparing attachment mechanisms, storage and tool combinations
My concept exploration / Phase 1, p. 13
15ideas explored3shortlisted concepts

Choose a useful combination.

I compared a single-head vacuum, a three-in-one tool and a dual-head concept. The dual-head direction offered the strongest balance in my concept scoring: related functions, simpler handling and greater feasibility.

Design decision

Combine tasks that belong together, while keeping attachments and collected fur easy to remove.

Concept evaluation and user feedback / Phase 1, p. 14. Scores reflect early design judgement.

Inside the conceptExploded PetEase CAD: brush head, split handle shell, fur chamber, motor and lower carbon compartment
My exploded CAD / Phase 1, p. 17

A system designed for access

Open it.
Empty it.
Use it again.

The body separates the cleaning attachment, collection chamber and motor. Detachable contact parts and a removable cartridge make maintenance visible in the product architecture.

300 mmProposed overall length
48 mmProposed body diameter

PetEase reached concept CAD and visual development. A physical working prototype and performance validation were outside this phase.

Explore the PetEase architecture
PetEase CAD detail showing the brush head separated from its twist-lock coupling
My CAD detail / Phase 1, p. 16

Interchangeable head

Twist. Lock. Change the task.

Locating pins follow curved slots to secure each attachment. The connection aligns the head with the airflow path, allowing the same handle to support grooming and surface-cleaning heads.

Design intent / Stable coupling with fewer separate tools

PetEase CAD with removable cylindrical fur cartridge beside the handle opening
My CAD detail / Phase 1, p. 15–16

Fur collection

Keep the cleaning tool clean.

A removable cartridge collects loose fur above the fan and motor. A filter separates the collected hair from the mechanism, while the side opening makes emptying the chamber part of the routine.

Design intent / Accessible removal and cleaning

PetEase CAD cutaway of the perforated lower housing and activated-carbon compartment
My CAD detail / Phase 1, p. 15–16

Passive filter

Give the second end a purpose.

The lower end contains a perforated activated-carbon compartment for passive odour reduction. It was conceived as a secondary function without adding another fan to the handheld body.

Concept proposal / Odour performance was not tested

PetEase handle showing a dedicated power button and a fan-speed switch
My CAD detail / Phase 1, p. 16

Simple controls

Make the next action obvious.

A dedicated power button and a low/high fan-speed switch keep the main interactions direct. A small OLED display was proposed for battery level and operating mode.

Concept proposal / Interface and circuit layout

03 / The team’s selection

A different concept.
A shared next step.

PetEase was my individual response to the brief. For the group build, we selected Preme’s RePooPress concept, which became Dooti after we reconsidered the heating area and battery demand.

My individual branch

PetEase

Modular cleaning and grooming

Concluded at concept CAD
Selected group branch

RePooPress

Home paper-bag heat press

Initial concept by Preme
Developed together

Dooti

Portable roll-fed bag maker

Team 14 working prototype
The constraint that changed the product

Heating a large sheet was poorly suited to a battery-powered device. The team moved to a narrow sealing line and an on-demand roll system, with a separate carrying pouch.

04 / Selected team project

Dooti.

Developed by Team 14

A small device.
A longer view of waste.

Dooti brings material dispensing, sealing and cutting into a portable bag maker. A reusable pouch extends the design beyond pickup to the often-overlooked experience of carrying waste.

Dooti final team presentation with the bag maker, reusable pouch, paper rolls and branded packaging
Final team design presentation / Portfolio p. 13. Branding and packaging are academic concepts; the displayed Battersea identity represents a proposed collaboration.
01

Pull

Choose a length from the refill roll. The transparent cover reveals how much material remains.

02

Seal

A timed heating cycle seals the inner cellulose film. The paper layer remains a separate pickup sheet.

03

Cut

A guided sliding blade separates the length. The team refined the slot and pull direction through prototypes.

04

Carry

A reusable collapsible pouch completes the proposed system for carrying the filled bag home.

My contribution / CAD + electronics

Make the idea
work inside the shell.

As the team’s CIO, I developed appearance and functional CAD, worked on circuit design and power calculations, and helped build and test the electronics.

I also supported component arrangement, soldering, assembly and integration, alongside the team’s feedback collection and final prototype testing.

Fusion 360 modellingCircuit & power analysisHardware testingAssembly integration

Individual contribution recorded in the final report, PDF p. 44. CAD, electronics and assembly were collaborative activities.

Team exploded Dooti assembly showing transparent lid, refill roll, sealing mechanism, controller and lower casing
Team assembly CAD / Portfolio p. 7

From bench to enclosure

Resolve the connections.
Then make them fit.

Dooti breadboard circuit with Raspberry Pi Pico and connected heating test components
01 / BreadboardTest control logic and connections.
Dooti compact stripboard prototype with Raspberry Pi Pico
02 / StripboardArrange the circuit for assembly.
Dooti prototype enclosure containing the controller, battery arrangement and wiring
03 / IntegrationBring electronics into the housing.
ControllerPi Pico

Switch inputs, thermistor feedback and status indication.

Reported heating cycle2 seconds

Timed heating of the inner film instead of continuous heating.

Programmed cutoff75 °C

A temperature fault stops heating and requires a reset.

Team prototype development / Portfolio pp. 5, 7 and report PDF pp. 29–32. Values describe the reported control design. A custom PCB was proposed as a further development step.

Prototype → Observe → Refine

A convincing render
still needs awkward tests.

Team Dooti exhibition stand where visitors tried the product with artificial waste and gave feedback
Team user testing at GERF / Portfolio p. 8
Explore the team’s original prototyping sheet

05 / Outcome & reflection

Design the routine.
Prove the details.

PetEase taught me to connect modular architecture to everyday maintenance. Dooti added the harder task of turning a shared concept into an integrated prototype under real power, space and time constraints.

Completed

Two distinct outcomes.

My PetEase concept reached sketches, design evaluation and detailed CAD. The team’s Dooti reached an integrated pull–seal–cut prototype, a pouch, packaging and exhibition testing.

Next validation

Test the whole experience.

Bag size, wet-waste handling, seal consistency, pouch cleaning and odour containment need broader trials. Accelerated material exposure did not establish full compostability or a validated disposal system.

What I would change

Test feasibility earlier.

The late shift away from a large heating area reduced prototyping time. I would bring power demand, component fit and a clear selection deadline into the first concept comparison.

Project credits

PetEase: individual concept by Yuxuan Zhou. Dooti: Team 14 — Yuxuan (CIO), Muk (CTO), Preme (CCO), Cici (COO). Preme originated RePooPress and led brand development; the final product, testing and presentation were a team effort.

← Return to the project circle